Taxacom: nomen nudum and synonymy question
Paul van Rijckevorsel
dipteryx at freeler.nl
Sat Jan 28 01:44:17 CST 2023
2023
In the interest of harmony between the various Codes,
it seems much preferable to maintain "rank" in its
present (universally understood) meaning.
Whether or not the terms "family-group", "genus-group",
and "species-group" are a good idea is another matter, but
any change will cause confusion. New terms had better
be a big improvement to justify a change.
Paul
On 27-Jan-23 22:54, Francisco Welter-Schultes via Taxacom wrote:
> Hi Doug,
> Actually your immediate approach would sound more logical, and I've
> never understood why they selected these terms "rank" and "group" for
> these meanings. It would make much more sense to talk of three ranks
> family, genus and species, and then subdivide in subranks or so. The
> term "group" has so many different meanings in taxonomy that it does
> not seem to fit really well for this purpose it has in the Code.
>
> The Linz Zoocode Committee uses the term "series" instead of "group",
> so also they are not happy with the ICZN terminology in this point.
>
> Best wishes
> Francisco
>
> Am 27.01.2023 um 22:24 schrieb Douglas Yanega via Taxacom:
>> On 1/27/23 11:02 AM, Francisco Welter-Schultes via Taxacom wrote:
>>> The definition for "rank" given in the Glossary is this one:
>>>
>>> rank, n. The level, for nomenclatural purposes, of a taxon in a
>>> taxonomic hierarchy (e.g. all families are for nomenclatural
>>> purposes at the same rank, which lies between superfamily and
>>> subfamily). The ranks of the family group, the genus group, and the
>>> species group at which nominal taxa may be established are stated in
>>> Articles 10.3, 10.4, 35.1, 42.1 and 45.1.
>>>
>>> A statement "there are three ranks in the Code: family-rank,
>>> genus-rank, and species-rank" would not be in line with this
>>> definition.
>>
>> Apologies. For some reason (low blood sugar?) when I responded I
>> forgot that the terminology in the Code is family-group, genus-group,
>> and species-group, not family-rank, etc. The "group" designation
>> crosses Linnean rank boundaries, but Francisco is correct, the Code
>> *does* use rank in the Linnean sense; it's the "-group"
>> categorization that is unique to the Code.
>>
>> Peace,
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
>
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at lists.ku.edu
> For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> https://lists.ku.edu/listinfo/taxacom
> You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at lists.ku.edu
> The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftaxacom.markmail.org%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C798e59e14ff14b9b077108db01037819%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638104886659803021%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WFmLE30tuF8S9TM%2FGmVtdrO31hSaLOYklFeH%2BIHqboM%3D&reserved=0
>
> Nurturing nuance while assailing ambiguity and admiring alliteration
> for about 36 years, 1987-2023
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.avg.com%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C798e59e14ff14b9b077108db01037819%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638104886659803021%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=dOquMelPG5VGHGziYu9HKuiU90I3zfVFMMj86sHguHg%3D&reserved=0
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list