[Taxacom] =?utf-8?q?Small_mystery_-_Haplogonophora_Br=C3=B6lemann?= =?utf-8?q?=2C_1931_in_Myriapoda_-_genus_or_order_name=3F?=

[Tony Rees]

As pointed out by my colleague and Chilopoda worker Carlos Martínez,
Npmenclator Zoologicus has done the same with another name from the same
work, Progonophora Brolemann, 1932 (listed as a genus but in fact an
order), original Nomen. Zool. page here:
http://ubio.org/NZ/PDF/Vol3/pg0912.pdf . I will adjust the relevant IRMNG
records directly, to reflect this new information.

Tony Rees, New South Wales, Australia
https://about.me/TonyRees
http://www.irmng.org


On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 07:11, Tony Rees <tonyrees49 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Rod, digitised taxonomic literature (plus your digging) to the
> rescue!
>
> All the best - Tony
>
>
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 06:18, Roderic Page <Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tony,
>>
>> The article is online on Gallica
>> https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5454464w/f6.image
>>
>> OCR of the text is:
>>
>> 278
>> H.-W. B ROLE MANN
>> HAPLOGONOPHORA nom. nov.
>> (Melagonozonia, pro p., Brolemann, 1916.)
>> Depuis notre publication de 1916 (Bull. Soc. Entom., France, année 1916,
>> n° 1, p. 53), nous sommes arrivé à la conviction qu’il est impossible de
>> maintenir côte à côte, dans le même Ordre, les Spiroboloïdes et les
>> luloïdes. Nous instituons donc pour les premiers une coupe nouvelle,
>> l’ordre des Haplogonophora, qui, jusqu’ici, ne contient que le sous-ordre
>> des Spiroboloïdea.
>> Pour unifier notre nomenclature, nous modifions les noms des
>> Meta-gonozonia et des Progonozonia, créés en 1916, et les remplaçons par
>> oeuxde :
>> Metagonophora, qui ne comprend plus que les formes du type de nos
>> luloïdes européens et peut-être les Cambalidae, et
>> Progonophora, englobant les Spirostreptoidea et sous-ordres voisins,
>> ainsi que les Polydesmoïdes.
>> Nous aurons l’occasion de revenir ultérieurement sur ces grandes
>> divisions des Diplopodes.
>>
>> In English (Google Translate)
>>
>> 278
>> H.-W. B ROLE MANN
>> HAPLOGONOPHORA name. Nov.
>> (Melagonozonia, pro p., Brolemann, 1916.)
>> Since our publication in 1916 (Bull Soc Entom, France, year 1916, No. 1,
>> p.53), we have come to the conviction that it is impossible to maintain,
>> side by side, in the same Order, the Spiroboloid and luloid. We thus
>> institute for the first a new section, the order of the Haplogonophora,
>> which until now contains only the suborder Spiroboloidea.
>> To unify our nomenclature, we modify the names of Meta-gonozonia and
>> Progonozonia, created in 1916, and replace them with:
>> Metagonophora, which only includes forms of the type of our European
>> luloids and perhaps Cambalidae, and
>> Progonophora, encompassing Spirostreptoidea and neighboring suborders, as
>> well as Polydesmoids.
>> We will have the opportunity to return later to these great divisions of
>> the Diplopoda.
>>
>> So looks like you are correct, this is not a genus name.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Rod
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 30 Sep 2019, at 21:05, Tony Rees via Taxacom <
>> taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Taxacomers,
>>
>> I am looking at some presently unresolved names I have listed in
>> Myriapoda,
>> originating from Nomenclator Zoologicus (listed therefore as genera or
>> subgenera), and have got to "Haplogonophora Broelemann 1932" which is
>> listed with the publication details "Arch. Zool. exp. gén. Paris, 72,
>> 278.". The full details of the original work appear to be:
>>
>> Brölemann, H. W. (1931). Myriapodes recueillis en Nouvelle -Calédonie et
>> aux Loyality. Archives de Zoologie expérimentale et générale, 72(2):
>> 275-316. Paris (
>> http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=sourcedetails&id$4465),
>> however
>> I have not seen this and it does not appear to be in BHL for copyright
>> reasons.
>>
>> Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirobolida) has "Haplogonophora
>> Brolemann, 1931" listed as a synonym of the order Spirobolida Bollman,
>> 1893
>> in Diplopoda, but without additional information RE sources. So I am
>> wondering if Nomen. Zool. is in error and this name is in fact a higher
>> taxon name and not a genus.
>>
>> MilliBase (http://www.millibase.org/) does not appear to contain this
>> name
>> at present, either as a genus or a higher taxon name, valid name or
>> synonym, so any advice from readers of Taxacom would be welcome (for
>> example if someone has access to page 278 of the work cited above).
>>
>> Thanks in advance - Tony
>>
>> Tony Rees, New South Wales, Australia
>> https://about.me/TonyRees
>> http://www.irmng.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Taxacom Mailing List
>>
>> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>> For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
>> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>> You can reach the person managing the list at:
>> taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>> The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
>> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>>
>> Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for 32 some years, 1987-2019.
>>
>>
>>