Search the Taxacom archive · Browse by month · Mirror of the former lists.ku.edu archive (1992–2025)

[Taxacom] Malus domestica conservation proposal

Redhead, Scott Scott.Redhead at AGR.GC.CA
Fri May 25 06:59:58 CDT 2012


Dear John:

Thank you and thank to Karen for mentioning Dan Nicolson's effort. Most
of us are aware of the enormous effort Dan put into the database and of
his other major contributions to botany and nomenclature, and sadly
realize he is no longer able to contribute. I think more people should
use the wonderful resource he provided and that was why I drew attention
to it.  

Kindest regards,
Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
[mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of John McNeill
Sent: May-25-12 4:26 AM
To: dipteryx at freeler.nl; taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Cc: jmcneill at rbge.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Malus domestica conservation proposal

Paul, Scott & al.

The "Proposals and Disposals" site was maintained by Dan Nicolson whose
health now precludes any botanical work.  The Department of Botany at
the Smithsonian Institution have now made arrangements for the site to
continue to be maintained, but, again for reasons outside of their
control, there has been some delay in getting it up-to-date.

John

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
John McNeill, Director Emeritus, Royal Ontario Museum;
    Honorary Associate, Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh Mailing address:
Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, Scotland, U.K.
Telephone:    +44-131-248-2848;  fax: +44-131-248-2901
Home office:  +44-162-088-0651
e-mail: jmcneill at rbge.ac.uk (mail to johnm at rom.on.ca is also read)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------


>>> "Paul van Rijckevorsel"  05/25/12 8:41 AM >>>
Yes, the "Proposals and Disposals" site at the Smithsonian can be very
useful, but the Malus domestica proposal is not listed, nor are the
actions taken on the Malus toringoides proposal, although this has been
reported on by the special Committee and the General Committee, and has
been accepted by the Melbourne Congress. The Malus domestica proposal
was published in April 2010, so it looks as if the site lags more than
two years behind? Perhaps an additional person should be assigned to
keep it up to date?

Publishing the deliberations of a Committee looks to be a very
attractive idea, but perhaps for some groups of taxa the outside
pressure is felt to be too severe for such openness to be risked?

Paul



  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Redhead, Scott
  To: Bevan Weir ; taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
  Cc: Paul van Rijckevorsel
  Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 2:38 PM
  Subject: RE: [Taxacom] Malus domestica conservation proposal


  Usually resolved conservation and rejection proposals in
botany/mycology/phycology are tracked at 

  http://botany.si.edu/references/codes/props/index.cfm

   

  but I do not see this more recent proposal. I do see:

   

  Here are the results of your query:

        Proposal No.
         
        
        Cons.:
         
       Malus rivularis
       
        Rej.:
         
       Malus fusca, Malus diversifolia
       
        Group:
         
       Sperm.
       
        Act:
         
       Csp
       
        Author:
         
       Suringar
       
        Where:
         
       Prop. Intl. Rules Bot. Nom.: 25. 1929.
       
        Synopsis:
         
       1930: 137
       
        Group Comm.:
         
        
        Gen. Comm.:
         
        
        Congr. Proc.:
         
       -1931: 619
       
        Code:
         
        
        Comm. & Rev.:
         
       Suringar in Meded. Rijks-Herb. 56: 43-44. 1928.
       


------------------------------------------------------------------------
------

        Proposal No.
         
       1848
       
        Cons.:
         
       Malus toringoides
       
        Rej.:
         
       Pyrus bhutanica
       
        Group:
         
       Vasc.
       
        Act:
         
       Csp
       
        Author:
         
       Qian, Liu, Hong, & Phipps
       
        Where:
         
       Taxon 57: 1009. 2008.
       
        Synopsis:
         
        
        Group Comm.:
         
        
        Gen. Comm.:
         
        
        Congr. Proc.:
         
        
        Code:
         
        
        Comm. & Rev.:
         

   

  As for the policy of not disclosing what is happening internally
within a committee, that really depends upon the committee and is not an
absolute rule. 

   

  Note that the Nomenclatural Committee for Fungi has been trying to
post its discussions to be more transparent:

   

  http://www.ima-mycology.org/CFF/

  http://www.ima-mycology.org/CFF/pdf.html

   

   

  Scott 

   

  -----Original Message-----
  From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
[mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Bevan Weir
  Sent: May-24-12 2:46 AM
  To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
  Subject: [Taxacom] Malus domestica conservation proposal

   

  Hi all,

   

  I am trying to track down what happen to this proposal "(1933)
Proposal to conserve the name Malus domestica against M. pumila, M.
communis, M. frutescens, and Pyrus dioica (Rosaceae)"

 
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iapt/tax/2010/00000059/00000002/ar
t00038

   

  There is no mention of it in "Report of the Nomenclature Committee for
Vascular Plants: 63"

 
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iapt/tax/2011/00000060/00000004/ar
t00025

  Despite mentioning other proposals e.g. 1932 and 1934, so I guess it
was not part of the IBC votes, but why not!? Is it explicitly rejected,
or just not considered?

   

  Thanks for any clarification.

   

   

   

  --

  Dr Bevan Weir

  Research Scientist

  Mycology and Bacteriology Group

  Biosystematics

  Landcare Research

   

  Phone: +64 9 574 4115 Mobile: +64 21 723826 email:
weirb at landcareresearch.co.nz

  Private Bag 92170, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Fungal Biosystematics Research

  Group Publications

  My Publications

   

   

  ________________________________

  Please consider the environment before printing this email

  Warning: This electronic message together with any attachments is
confidential. If you receive it in error: (i) you must not read, use,
disclose, copy or retain it; (ii) please contact the sender immediately
by reply email and then delete the emails.

  The views expressed in this email may not be those of Landcare
Research New Zealand Limited. http://www.landcareresearch.co.nz
_______________________________________________

   

  Taxacom Mailing List

  Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu

  http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

   

  The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
these methods:

   

  (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org

   

  (2) a Google search specified as:
site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
these methods:

(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org

(2) a Google search specified as:
site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here

 
 
_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
these methods:

(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org

(2) a Google search specified as:
site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here





More information about the Taxacom mailing list