[Taxacom] Dispersal... again

[John Grehan]

Seems to me that Curtis could figure out an answer by reading the
panbiogeographic literature.

John Grehan 

-----Original Message-----
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
[mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Curtis Clark
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 12:27 AM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Dispersal... again

On 10/27/2011 7:54 PM, Michael Heads wrote:
> Mutation bias [...]

Let me try again. If mutation is truly random, and mutation bias
unimportant, does panbiogeography lose some of its explanatory value? 
I'm trying to understand how big is the required buy-in.

(I actually think the evidence for mutation bias is compelling, although
I'm still not sure how much of a role it plays.)

--
--
Curtis Clark
Cal Poly Pomona


_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
these methods:

(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org

(2) a Google search specified as:
site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here