[Taxacom] Dispersal... again

[Curtis Clark]

On 10/27/2011 7:54 PM, Michael Heads wrote:
> Mutation bias [...]

Let me try again. If mutation is truly random, and mutation bias 
unimportant, does panbiogeography lose some of its explanatory value? 
I'm trying to understand how big is the required buy-in.

(I actually think the evidence for mutation bias is compelling, although 
I'm still not sure how much of a role it plays.)

-- 
--
Curtis Clark
Cal Poly Pomona