Search the Taxacom archive · Browse by month · Mirror of the former lists.ku.edu archive (1992–2025)

Taxacom: supposed evidence of Pacific ignuana dispersal

Michael Heads m.j.heads at gmail.com
Sun Mar 23 17:27:48 CDT 2025


it's nothing to do with wording. They don't mention the standard vicariance
model for iguanas-agamids. They don't seem to be aware of it, but maybe
they are.

On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:36?AM Geoff Read via Taxacom <
taxacom at lists.ku.edu> wrote:

>
> One more try at those ignus.
> John Grehan wrote:
> "That the Fiji iguana are most closely related to iguanas in America has
> never been at issue."
> Thanks John. However, that's what the paper is about. Really, of course you
> are free to criticise, but I don't think these authors deserve your scorn.
> They present their data, they discuss it thoroughly, and they include as
> possible explanations similar scenarios to those you believe in even if
> they don't use the specialist wording you would use. It's a molecular
> paper. Let's assess it on that basis. Future papers with further molecular
> data from a wider array of species might confirm their conclusions or might
> have a different interpretation. This is the usual progression, as we know.
> We shall see.
> Cheers,Geoff
> --
> Geoffrey B. Read, Ph.D.
> Wellington, NEW ZEALAND
> gread at actrix.gen.nz
>
> ---- Original Message ----
> From: John Grehan
> To: "Michael Heads"
> Cc: "Geoff Read" , "taxacom"
> Sent: Sun, Mar 23, 2025, 4:39 AM
> Subject: Re: Taxacom: supposed evidence of Pacific ignuana dispersal
>         Geoff,
>         Interesting to see your feedback.  You conclude that the PNAS
> article and
> does ?seem? [what does ?seem? mean?]  to be a very thorough
> even-handed assessment of all the possibilities in their discussion. I
> agree fully if ?thorough? and ?even handed? means that its
> even-handed to misrepresent fossil calibrated ages as actual or approximate
> rather than minimums, to represent their six areas as having some kind of
> empirical existence rather than fabrications (from where one knows not),
> and to be thorough it to ignore (or worse be ignorant of) a competing
> biogeographic hypothesis (The Pacific tectonic model). Yep ? if all those
> practices are ?thorough? and ?even-handed? then it?s certainly
> that.
>
>         Regarding your reference to humans having observed iguanas making
> landfall
> on islands. That demonstrates nothing at all about allopatric divergence.
> All it shows is ecological dispersal effecting range expansion of a species
> range. No different to some bug being blown onto my vege garden (to my
> detriment)
>
>         So, when you say that ?they seem to cover every prior hypothesis?.
> Well, they don?t and that?s a fact.
>
>         Not sure what you mean when you say ?Don't go way up the
> classification.
>  Do that and anything is a possibility.? Not really. The point is that
> the iguanas and their sister group is allopatric other than Madagascar. If
> one wants to invent all sorts of wanderings, how is it that over all this
> time these taxa are so allopatric, and as Heads notes, why do details of
> Old World distribution match standard biogeographic breaks? Vicariance
> origin would give a coherent explanation that allows for subsequent range
> expansion of either or both groups in what is now Madagascar.
>
>         That the Fiji iguana are most closely related to iguanas in
> America has
> never been at issue. Not sure the context of your comment.
>
>         Altogether a great paper if one is into sensationalist
> fabrications that
> leave out completing research findings. All very much the order of the day
> in many biogeographic works
>
>         One of the popularist outlets included ?expert reaction? commentary
> ? from a dispersalist of course. I suggested they include my ?expert?
> reaction as well. This went to the Australia contact and they kicked the
> can to their NZ office. Perhaps I am a cynic, but I am guessing I won?t
> be surprised at the outcome (knowing what a closed shop the NZ
> institutional biogeography situation is).
>         Cheers, John
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 6:26?AM Michael Heads via Taxacom  wrote:
> If protoiguanid-agamids, and then pre-  and proto-iguanids were already in
>  the west Pacific, there is no need for fully-fledged iguanids, let alone
>  Brachylophus, to migrate anywhere. The allopatry within Iguania
>  (pleurodonts - Fiji and east, vs acrodonts - Solomons and west) is the key
>  to the family distribution boundaries there (i.e.
>  phylogenetic-biogeographic breaks), but the authors don't mention it.
>  On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 9:45?PM Geoff Read via Taxacom
>  wrote:
>  >
>  > No Michael, they don't "just say" that.  There is extensive discussion
>  > including of a Eurasian etc origin and they seem to cover every prior
>  > hypothesis.Don't go way up the classification.  Do that and anything is
> a
>  > possibility.Down at the subfamily level of Iguaninae their work links
>  > Fijian species Brachylophus bulabula in a clade with Dipsosaurus
> dorsalis
>  > of the Southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico. And the other
>  > iguanas nearby in their tree are N. American, Galapagos, and
> Antilles.The
>  > tree as published is the salient part, not the full tree, which would be
>  > nice to see - apparently that is in the supplementary data.
>  > Geoff
>  >
>  > --
>  > Geoffrey B. Read, Ph.D.
>  > Wellington, NEW ZEALAND
>  > gread at actrix.gen.nz (mailto:gread at actrix.gen.nz)
>  >
>  > ---- Original Message ----
>  > From: Michael Heads
>  > To: "Geoff Read"
>  > Cc: "taxacom"
>  > Sent: Sat, Mar 22, 2025, 5:27 PM
>  > Subject: Re: Taxacom: supposed evidence of Pacific ignuana dispersal
>  >
>  >   They just say: 'Pleurodonta = Iguanidae sensu ( 16 ) (e.g., anoles,
>  > horned lizards, and relatives), are also largely restricted to the
> western
>  > hemisphere'.  They don't mention the sister group, let alone vicariance
>  > with it, although it's a classic case of vicariance that's been cited
> many
>  > times.
>  >       Pleurodonta: Madagascar + Americas + Fiji/Tonga. (i..e
> trans-Pacific
>  > + Atlantic).
>  >       Acrodonta (sis group of Pleurodonta): Madagascar + Africa + Europe
> +
>  > Asia to Australia and Solomons. (Trans-Indian).
>  > The groups are allopatric except in Madagascar. The distributions are
>  > determined by breaks (of a global ancestor) in the Atlantic, around
>  > Madagascar, and between the Solomons and Fiji, all areas of major
> rifting.
>  > There is no dispersal indicated except (perhaps) in Madagascar.
>  > On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 12:26?PM Geoff Read via Taxacom  wrote:
>  >  Here's one of the news articles mentioned by John.
>  >
>  >
>
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapnews.com%2Farticle%2Figuana-fiji-raft-float-journey-travel-9732d828c28a8374a6873fbc1b3d4af2&data%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C9159da938a0042e7448308dd6a59f973%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638783657574141058%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ctVnK1IQlzA2scLaBtsNwf%2FQMCMi53CdU%2BEItrd7Kwg%3D&reserved=0
> (
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapnews.com%2Farticle%2Figuana-fiji-raft-float-journey-travel-9732d828c28a8374a6873fbc1b3d4af2&data%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C9159da938a0042e7448308dd6a59f973%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638783657574169475%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=DJXJipM%2F5p6SsBz%2FTWqixO%2BsFxheZODkaig7n9LuFmc%3D&reserved=0
> )
>  > (
>  >
>
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapnews.com%2Farticle%2Figuana-fiji-raft-float-journey-travel-9732d828c28a8374a6873fbc1b3d4af2&data%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C9159da938a0042e7448308dd6a59f973%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638783657574184071%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=cs3YcS1CJUMCngEXHBGhj%2FtY5gKj31MP5rZMmMgANis%3D&reserved=0
> (
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapnews.com%2Farticle%2Figuana-fiji-raft-float-journey-travel-9732d828c28a8374a6873fbc1b3d4af2&data%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C9159da938a0042e7448308dd6a59f973%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638783657574198064%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4WKl5TOcHP%2F6beJxif8H00FQyP26HKhUF9aGgAwgPsc%3D&reserved=0
> )
>  > )
>  >  I've read the PNAS article and it does seem to be a very thorough
>  > even-handed assessment of all the possibilities in their discussion.
>  >  They say humans have observed iguanas making landfall on islands and
> quote
>  > this presumably famous instance:
>  >  "In 1995, a vegetation mat
>  >  with at least 15 individual green iguanas (Iguana iguana) that likely
>  >  originated on the islands of Guadeloupe was observed making landfall
>  >  on Anguilla, an island 300 km away that was already inhabited by
>  >  a different species of iguana, I. delicatissima"
>  >  One quibble is that they work at a genus-level with little mention of
>  > species.  The genus is an 'it' as though it is a physical entity. A
>  > practice more familiar of palaeontologists rather than molecular
>  > biologists.
>  >  This quote illustrates the style:  "Brachylophus , which contains 4
> extant
>  > and 1 extinct species, is morphologically divergent from other iguanas
> and
>  > occurs extremely far from all of its extant relatives"
>  >  Substitute 'are' for 'is' and 'their' for 'its' and see how it reads.
> The
>  > actual species is Brachylophus bulabula.  It gets just one mention (in a
>  > figure), and there are relations on different Fijian islands, plus
>  > apparently also one iguana human-transported.
>  >  --
>  >  Geoffrey B. Read, Ph.D.
>  >  Wellington, NEW ZEALAND
>  >  gread at actrix.gen.nz (mailto:gread at actrix.gen.nz)
> (mailto:gread at actrix.gen.nz (mailto:gread at actrix.gen.nz))
>  >  >---- Original Message ----
>  >  >From: John Grehan via Taxacom
>  >  >To: "taxacom"
>  >  >Sent: Fri, Mar 21, 2025, 9:33 AM
>  >  >Subject: Taxacom: supposed evidence of Pacific ignuana dispersal
>  >  >
>  >  >Some of you may have seen this as it's been splashed around widely on
> the
>  >  >propaganda circuit.
>  >  >
>  >  >Iguanas rafted more than 8,000 km from North America to Fiji PNAS 2025
>  > Vol.
>  >  >122 No. 12 e2318622122 https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1073%2Fpnas.2318622122&data%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C9159da938a0042e7448308dd6a59f973%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638783657574211023%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=HxRJ1NV7kHjr5a0H8jSWg40VxdsVChEsGUv9JJyvHOE%3D&reserved=0
> (https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1073%2Fpnas.2318622122&data%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C9159da938a0042e7448308dd6a59f973%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638783657574224181%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=KUe%2BoreX9vn%2FV5gZtJK5Hf3q%2FpgOZy3fBxPxezbN7rA%3D&reserved=0)
>  > (https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1073%2Fpnas.2318622122&data%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C9159da938a0042e7448308dd6a59f973%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638783657574240295%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2BWKPzyU5xuL6dAK0yec6JiPsxh%2BuaVarQnuVqjAJD0k%3D&reserved=0
> (https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1073%2Fpnas.2318622122&data%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C9159da938a0042e7448308dd6a59f973%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638783657574258520%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iODX516bmLRD8r6xXygtubrgOmxaesbJ13qNqhn%2FVb0%3D&reserved=0))
>  >  >
>  >  >It's just another duplication of the same old trash. Abstract claims
> that
>  >  >?Here, we investigate the occurrence and timing of the greatest
> known
>  >  >long-distance oceanic dispersal event in the history of terrestrial
>  >  >vertebrates?the rafting of iguanas from North America to Fiji.?
>  > Trouble
>  >  >with this is that it makes out that this ?long-distance oceanic
>  > dispersal
>  >  >event? is an established scientific fact when it is not.
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >Then they assert that ?Iguanas are large-bodied herbivores that are
>  >  >well-known overwater dispersers, including species that colonized the
>  >  >Caribbean and the Gal?pagos islands.? when there is absolutely no
>  >  >empirically based evidence that the Galapagos iguanas ever dispersed
>  >  >overwater to the Galapagos.
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >And the central rot (as in decay) of their claims is the same as all
> the
>  >  >other center of origin-chance dispersal recipes: The divergence
> estimate
>  > is
>  >  >based on fossil calibration which can only render minimum ages.
> Anything
>  >  >else (such as priors) is conjecture. So their timeline is erroneous in
>  > this
>  >  >respect. The other is that their ancestral-areas analysis is simply a
>  >  >recipe that cannot empirically distinguish between chance dispersal
> and
>  >  >vicariance as either can generate the same phylogenetic area sequence.
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >Given their calling attention to the Galapagos it seems an incredible
>  >  >oversight to have missed Heads & Grehan 2021 on Galapagos
> biogeography,
>  >  >including the Fiji connection. I've seen this before, where there is a
>  >  >narrow range of citations restricted to the same school of thought.
>  >  >Anything else does not exist. This, then, is the pinnacle of academic
>  >  >achievement in the US (maybe a good argument for the government
> trashing
>  >  >science?).
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >Cheers, John
>  >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
>
> Nurturing nuance while assailing ambiguity for 38 years, 1987-2025.
>
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at lists.ku.edu
> For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> https://lists.ku.edu/listinfo/taxacom
> You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at lists.ku.edu
>
>
>

-- 
Dunedin, New Zealand.

My books:

*Biogeography and evolution in New Zealand. *Taylor and Francis/CRC, Boca
Raton FL. 2017.
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.routledge.com%2FBiogeography-and-Evolution-in-New-Zealand%2FHeads%2Fp%2Fbook%2F9781498751872&data%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C9159da938a0042e7448308dd6a59f973%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638783657574274542%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=QtpBvrPxkldDqaHn9gZ8l4B5x%2BEKwqis6egOlAXlkSc%3D&reserved=0


*Biogeography of Australasia:  A molecular analysis*. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge. 2014. https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cambridge.org%2F9781107041028&data%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C9159da938a0042e7448308dd6a59f973%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638783657574288380%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata&s%2B0f7u3PquMiV43JyH5m4UzgfuOUzl9vqVLq5Xn9Y%3D&reserved=0


*Molecular panbiogeography of the tropics. *University of California Press,
Berkeley. 2012. https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ucpress.edu%2Fbook.php%3Fisbn%3D9780520271968&data%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C9159da938a0042e7448308dd6a59f973%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638783657574302516%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdataËDrCmeiNV%2Fz4INfdUnn3q2%2FsRdUIOrOVL%2Fu2ie6IyE%3D&reserved=0


*Panbiogeography: Tracking the history of life*. Oxford University Press,
New York. 1999. (With R. Craw and J. Grehan).
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.co.nz%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DBm0_QQ3Z6GUC&data%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C9159da938a0042e7448308dd6a59f973%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638783657574316568%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8vGMJRelEy4egeDhUb78W44HJWQUDre2JfPw7tnQzao%3D&reserved=0
<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.co.nz%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DBm0_QQ3Z6GUC%26dq%3Dpanbiogeography%26source%3Dgbs_navlinks_s&data%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C9159da938a0042e7448308dd6a59f973%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638783657574330122%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=sKrPycAx8Yh4qsa6becLxujWr9T3HXC0ljrWuQoFVR8%3D&reserved=0>




More information about the Taxacom mailing list