Dear TAXACOM readers, There's no concordance between journal impact factors and species discovery/description in mycology: https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmycokeys.pensoft.net%2Farticle%2F136048%2F&data=05%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C63590f4814e1402f68e208dd0a002146%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638677718133128490%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=cTqNZqmlsw8uOZSFfZxQwPrMX2TDDUReanGUJOUSNtk%3D&reserved=0 No big surprise to anyone in systematics/taxonomy, I guess. What’s new here is that we bring actual data to the table. Lots of it. And the data simply say: no concordance. Best wishes, Henrik Nilsson, University of Gothenburg -- Google Scholar profile: https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fscholar.google.se%2Fcitations%3Fuser%3DR9TtRLUAAAAJ&data=05%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C63590f4814e1402f68e208dd0a002146%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638677718133128490%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=BZulm4%2B3L93vG%2Fy%2FSLlKg%2F2wVdlyJUc4um8hiTqt1Ts%3D&reserved=0 WoS profile: https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.webofscience.com%2Fwos%2Fauthor%2Frecord%2F336209&data=05%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C63590f4814e1402f68e208dd0a002146%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638677718133128490%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rvSAER%2B2YciH2vk8L%2BHqG5hK%2FOi4JMYqeTNPtUGe0X0%3D&reserved=0