Taxacom: some thoughts on the nature of names

[Paul van Rijckevorsel]

Just published (OA):
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmapress.com%2Fbn%2Farticle%2Fview%2Fbionomina.39.1.1&data=05%7C02%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C4a6d59153a094b36177d08dd02426a68%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638669207374063868%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C40000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=j%2BgC5U%2F%2FMCItIwrRn3xC9RhlIhs5vTDVWfS%2FqyY7xUI%3D&reserved=0

Presenting some thoughts about the basic nature of
(scientific) names, and how they interact with their
environment (nomenclatural, taxonomical, world at
large). Accepting a risk of stating the overly obvious,
I tried to phrase these thoughts as straightforward
and simple as possible (but not simpler than that),
in a paper that should not be too long.

Paul