Taxacom: Science journal unethical fees resignations

[John Grehan]

Nothing new about the publishing situation, but interesting development.
Cynical part of me wonders if anything will really ever change. The world
is run by rats. Excerpt below from 'The Guardian'. Rest at
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fscience%2F2023%2Fmay%2F07%2Ftoo-greedy-mass-walkout-at-global-science-journal-over-unethical-fees&data%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ce74957a8b5f549a82df808db5a16206d%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638202823335983793%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=yvPGvzXxDlz28PPKb8sVUFVk6662TQ9mEPhYwyg%2Bjd8%3D&reserved=0

More than 40 leading scientists have resigned en masse from the editorial
board of a top science journal in protest at what they describe as the
?greed? of publishing giant Elsevier.

The entire academic board of the journal Neuroimage, including professors
from Oxford University, King?s College London and Cardiff University
resigned after Elsevier refused to reduce publication charges.

Academics around the world have applauded what many hope is the start of a
rebellion against the huge profit margins in academic publishing, which
outstrip those made by Apple, Google and Amazon.

Neuroimage, the leading publication globally for brain-imaging research, is
one of many journals that are now ?open access? rather than sitting behind
a subscription paywall. But its charges to authors reflect its prestige,
and academics now pay over ?2,700 for a research paper to be published. The
former editors say this is ?unethical? and bears no relation to the costs
involved.

Professor Chris Chambers, head of brain stimulation at Cardiff University
and one of the resigning team, said: ?Elsevier preys on the academic
community, claiming huge profits while adding little value to science.?

He has urged fellow scientists to turn their backs on the Elsevier journal
and submit papers to a nonprofit open-access journal which the team is
setting up instead.

He told the Observer: ?All Elsevier cares about is money and this will cost
them a lot of money. They just got too greedy. The academic community can
withdraw our consent to be exploited at any time. That time is now.?

Elsevier, a Dutch company that claims to publish 18% of the world?s
scientific papers, reported a 10% increase in its revenue to ?2.9bn last
year. But it?s the profit margins, nearing 40%, according to its 2019
accounts, which anger academics most. The big scientific publishers keep
costs low because academics write up their research ? typically funded by
charities and the public purse ? for free. They ?peer review? each other?s
work to verify it is worth publishing for free, and academic editors
collate it for free or for a small stipend. Academics are then often
charged thousands of pounds to have their work published in open-access
journals, or universities will pay very high subscription charges.


-- 
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhepialidsoftheworld.com.au%2F&data%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ce74957a8b5f549a82df808db5a16206d%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638202823335983793%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fHR9xo%2F6FxmdbMTKzOegwhBm8tt92JGE9BduwvXAX5c%3D&reserved=0 (use the 'visit archived web site'
link, then the 'Ghost Moth Research page' link.