On 22-Jun-23 11:56, Mike Sadka via Taxacom wrote > [...] I have rarely seen anyone suggest that the best way to deal with this [...] For example, using more local organism names as epithets [...]. > > It might be that many current detractors would accept this as a reasonable compromise. *** See Prop. 209: https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fdoi%2Fepdf%2F10.1002%2Ftax.12904&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C38230d2e65a447ad02d308db730ba20c%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638230266774994447%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=1NWKjIXTd0lLdnLTSpUpLjg8bnNztLzQHhm%2BLgxOGdM%3D&reserved=0 Paul -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.avg.com%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C38230d2e65a447ad02d308db730ba20c%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638230266774994447%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=L9PZJsuVn294%2F2IEJei9EmQe90liWtUeQkICeniKM2s%3D&reserved=0