Taxacom: Quick question RE availability of a name in zoology (was animal, now pseudofossil)

[Tony Rees]

Thanks Thomas, that was what I thought was the case, so the authors in the
cited 1981 paper got it wrong.

Cheers - Tony

On Mon, 30 Jan 2023, 7:00 pm Thomas Pape, <tpape at snm.ku.dk> wrote:

> Tony:
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 2.2. Names of taxa at some time but not later classified as animals
>
> Any available name of a taxon that has at any time been classified as
> animal continues to compete in homonymy in zoological nomenclature even
> though the taxon is later not classified as animal.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /Thomas Pape
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Taxacom <taxacom-bounces at lists.ku.edu> On Behalf Of Tony Rees via
> Taxacom
> Sent: 30. januar 2023 06:08
> To: taxacom <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
> Subject: Taxacom: Quick question RE availability of a name in zoology (was
> animal, now pseudofossil)
>
> Hi all,
>
> The answer to this one is probably staring me in the face somewhere but I
> cannot see it.
>
> If a genus name is erected in zoology for (in this instance) a supposed
> fossil mammal tooth, which subsequently is re-interpreted as a pseudofossil
> i.e. non-biological, does the name stand in zoological nomenclature e.g.
> for subsequent homonymy? I would have thought yes, however these authors
> say no in a 1981 paper:
>
> Hopson, J. A., & Reif, W. E. (1981). The status of Archaeodon reuningi von
> Huene, a supposed late Triassic mammal from Southern Africa. *Neues
> Jahrbuch f?r Geologie und Pal?ontologie-Monatshefte*, 307-310.
>
> The authors state: [because it represents a non-biological artifact] "the
> name Arachaeodon is thus excluded from zoological nomenclature".
>
> One reason that this is potentially relevant is that there is a later
> instance of the same name, i.e. Archaeodon Crickmay, 1930, a mollusc,
> currently treated as a junior synonym of Cucullaea Lamarck, 1801 however it
> would be good to know whether that name is technically available, or
> preoccupied.
>
> Thoughts, advice welcome!
>
> Regards - Tony
>
> Tony Rees, New South Wales, Australia
>
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.irmng.org%2F&data%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ceb2de68a008d4c95859408db02984d04%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638106625388006953%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=KHO4GUc3X9t0EQ7UW%2BZjYtl%2Bg5his5fPCJe4LHV%2FTcc%3D&reserved=0
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
>
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at lists.ku.edu For list
> information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ku.edu%2Flistinfo%2Ftaxacom&data%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ceb2de68a008d4c95859408db02984d04%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638106625388006953%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=uYt%2B09MCnROgevH4N7HC1kea5E%2FeflPKlyaatL%2BvqL8%3D&reserved=0
> You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at lists.ku.edu
> The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftaxacom.markmail.org%2F&data%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Ceb2de68a008d4c95859408db02984d04%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638106625388006953%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Hqe5G%2F2Ix4AN%2Fbv7RX0%2F2LMCXFipe4ryYAn2%2BMDQTRk%3D&reserved=0
>
> Nurturing nuance while assailing ambiguity and admiring alliteration for
> about 36 years, 1987-2023
>