Taxacom: nomen nudum and synonymy question
David Bettman
dbettman at calacademy.org
Fri Jan 27 11:48:33 CST 2023
2023
> Note that a JOS is an unavailable name, since it is based on the same
> individual type specimen (species-group), or the same type species
> (genus group)
Assuming the JOS meets all the requirements of Code Articles 10 through 20,
then it actually is an available name--but a permanently invalid one.
Availability of a name and validity of a name are two separate concepts;
the (objective or subjective) validity of a name does not change the
availability of that name.
Cheers,
David
*David Bettman* (he | him | his)
Curatorial Assistant (Entomology)
Vice President and Archivist, *The Lepidopterists' Society*
Institute for Biodiversity Science and Sustainability
California Academy of Sciences
T 415.379.5360
dbettman at calacademy.org
55 Music Concourse Drive
Golden Gate Park
San Francisco, CA 94118
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.calacademy.org%2F&data%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Cfb1586bda3f8432b523d08db008ecbd6%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638104385525581495%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=sC8qUuTagZ2Q6cBcOruWxni%2FJ%2BNzC76fJjGYJwqnJKQ%3D&reserved=0
Facebook <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fcalacademy&data%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Cfb1586bda3f8432b523d08db008ecbd6%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638104385525581495%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EV5cMeQ%2BXgs7ndZ%2BSsOc1il80LiG%2BmzWm2%2BtXmEQMEM%3D&reserved=0> | Twitter
<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Fcalacademy&data%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Cfb1586bda3f8432b523d08db008ecbd6%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638104385525581495%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vdCVaSOTegV4DFJNTUXBh1lSpsHguSQdabOJ%2F3hyxA8%3D&reserved=0> | Instagram
<https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.instagram.com%2Fcalacademy%2F&data%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Cfb1586bda3f8432b523d08db008ecbd6%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638104385525581495%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=TjuPqTX8qHz7651nLlV4mGI3zEaNzqtsgN1QduG7MGI%3D&reserved=0>
*The California Academy of Sciences is now open!* Learn how we?re keeping
guests safe?and make reservations <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.calacademy.org%2Freopening&data%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Cfb1586bda3f8432b523d08db008ecbd6%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638104385525581495%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Sx6ySXHSI6eLmj1VjIeqsNf9MxvQ2tCxaGWLzw5Ot4I%3D&reserved=0>
for your next visit today.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 9:25 AM Adam Cotton via Taxacom <
taxacom at lists.ku.edu> wrote:
Replies interspersed:
>
> On 28/01/2023 00:03, John Grehan via Taxacom wrote:
> > Thank you to everyone who responded and helped clarify the situation.
> First
> > clarification is that the name in question is not a nomen nudum as it was
> > described in the first published article of that year.
>
> Correct.
>
> > Second question I would like to clarify here is that since the name is
> > designated an aberration, it does not fall within the Code - that it is
> > 'unavailable' as a taxon within the code. I am fine with that, but if
> such
> > a name is 'unavailable', does this mean that one does not recognize the
> > name as a 'synonym'? For example, Nielsen et al (2000) list of
> > Hepialdiae include many infrasubspecies names under the applicable
> species
> > names. Should that not have done that? Or can one list infrasubspecies
> > names, but not treat them as synonyms? Could I list them as
> 'unavailable'?
>
> All relevant names can be included in a taxon synonymy, and it is useful
> to add the status of the name after it as well. I use '[IFS]' for
> infrasubspecific names, and similarly it is worth including other types
> of status too, eg. JOS (junior objective synonym), JS (junior synonym),
> JH (junior homonym), NN (nomen nudum), PS (published in synonymy) etc.
> Note that a JOS is an unavailable name, since it is based on the same
> individual type specimen (species-group), or the same type species
> (genus group); whereas a JS is a subjective opinion, and the name is
> still available.
> Don't forget to include a list of abbreviations. I recommend NOT using
> 'NP' for homonyms as nomen praeoccupatum, and nomen protectum are
> different but have the same initials.
>
> > This question arises as I finalize a revised Hepialidae catalog, and had
> > followed Nielsen et al in listing infrasubspecies name. In the current
> list
> > I include information on type locality and type depository only for
> species
> > and subspecies names (when known). For infrasubspecies names I have just
> > noted the locality (i.e. not as a type locality), and collection
> depository
> > (but, again, not as a type collection).
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > John Grehan
>
> Good luck!
> Adam.
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
>
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at lists.ku.edu
> For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Favanan.url-protection.com%2Fv1%2Furl%3Fo%3Dhttps%253A%2F%2Flists.ku.edu%2Flistinfo%2Ftaxacom%26g%3DMDlkZTE2ZTQ1YjM0MmRkMg%3D%3D%26h%3DOWQ3MjA4NTJkMmZjYzk0M2RjNjMxZjBmM2I1Njg3ZDNlODY4ZjQ4MjQ1ZTVjYjQ1M2U1MDg1ODlkZmFmNDg4ZA%3D%3D%26p%3DYXAzOmNhbGFjYWRlbXk6YTpnOjBmZTI2NWM2NWNjMzNiYzZkOTgyMDkyZWZhMWQwZjdkOnYxOnA6VA%3D%3D&data%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Cfb1586bda3f8432b523d08db008ecbd6%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638104385525581495%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=h92nXNoYREp7GNx5vLxEfE%2FyM%2BfIVjS0Q0yPMDqTeVw%3D&reserved=0
> You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at lists.ku.edu
> The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Favanan.url-protection.com%2Fv1%2Furl%3Fo%3Dhttps%253A%2F%2Ftaxacom.markmail.org%26g%3DNmI3OGE0OTg0ZGJlZjEzYQ%3D%3D%26h%3DMThjZjEyMThhZjU4NThiNWQ0YTU2ZGU5MmZiNzMyNmY0NjAyNzZiOGZlZDYxMjJlMGU0MWU1YjY1ZTIwNzU5NA%3D%3D%26p%3DYXAzOmNhbGFjYWRlbXk6YTpnOjBmZTI2NWM2NWNjMzNiYzZkOTgyMDkyZWZhMWQwZjdkOnYxOnA6VA%3D%3D&data%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Cfb1586bda3f8432b523d08db008ecbd6%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C638104385525581495%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=RLMk2PQNDGXAdyjHwAfzo%2FGr70C%2FuQgMRZxuGNvUDpE%3D&reserved=0
>
> Nurturing nuance while assailing ambiguity and admiring alliteration for
> about 36 years, 1987-2023
>
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list