Taxacom: Dates of e-pubs ahead of print?

[Thomas Pape]

We have two issues here, non-compliant works and non-compliant names.

When a scientific work is published, the work may:
       (1a) be in compliance with ICZN Article 8 and not excluded by Art. 9, and the work has then been published for the purposes of zoological nomenclature
       (1b) not be in compliance with ICZN Article 8 (or be excluded by Art. 9), and the work is outside zoological nomenclature

A name proposed in a work deemed not to have been published for the purposes of zoological nomenclature is not regulated by the Code. 
Such a name is an unpublished name and will fall outside of the terminology applied to names published in the meaning of the Code. As explained by Francisco.

This is a technicality stemming from how terms are defined, but it is practical to classify works as being either inside (and with content regulated by) or outside (and with content not regulated by) the existing legislation.

Names that are published [for the purposes of zoological nomenclature] after 1930 but fails to conform to Art. 13 are nomina nuda.
Names published [for the purposes of zoological nomenclature] after 1999 and complying with Art. 13 but not complying with Article 16 are "unavailable".

/Thomas


-----Original Message-----
From: Taxacom <taxacom-bounces at lists.ku.edu> On Behalf Of Adam Cotton via Taxacom
Sent: 3. september 2022 22:06
To: taxacom at lists.ku.edu
Subject: Re: Taxacom: Dates of e-pubs ahead of print?

On 04/09/2022 02:53, Francisco Welter-Schultes via Taxacom wrote:
>
> A name that qualifies for being a nomen nudum must be published in the 
> sense of the Code.
>
> Glossary:
> nomen nudum (pl. nomina nuda), n. A Latin term referring to a name 
> that, if published before 1931, fails to conform to Art. 12; or, if 
> published after 1930, fails to conform to Art. 13. A nomen nudum is 
> not an available name, and therefore the same name may be made 
> available later for the same or a different concept; in such a case it 
> would take authorship and date [Arts. 50, 21] from that act of 
> establishment, not from any earlier publication as a nomen nudum.
>
> In short words, a nomen nudum is a published new name that was not 
> equipped with a description.
>
> This is too brief, because a description can be substituted by 
> something else, but this is the idea behind.
>
> Best wishes
> Francisco
 >
 >
 >


Francisco,

What status do you give to names published after 1999 but not complying with Article 16? I would also treat these as nomina nuda.

Adam.
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List

Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at lists.ku.edu For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit: https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ku.edu%2Flistinfo%2Ftaxacom&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C7daf09fb011c409c86f208da8df5255d%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C637978381278571590%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=aAfWVXnBvNh75iYgngOSSgoR7vhyxWMcWbQfAzcZqWY%3D&reserved=0
You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at lists.ku.edu The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at: https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftaxacom.markmail.org%2F&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7C7daf09fb011c409c86f208da8df5255d%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C637978381278571590%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=biUiv1MmofkwzxuXd%2FZ%2FLxueC60g%2BP0aeJIUNjbD5VI%3D&reserved=0

Nurturing nuance while assailing ambiguity for about 35 years, 1987-2022.