Taxacom: Meier et al.'s re-analysis of the data in Sharkey et al.’s (2021) in Cladistics

[Evangelos Vlachos]

https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fonlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fdoi%2F10.1111%2Fcla.12489&data=05%7C01%7Ctaxacom%40lists.ku.edu%7Cbeaed8f6ec134543537108da2222ceb7%7C3c176536afe643f5b96636feabbe3c1a%7C0%7C0%7C637859830254188712%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zpqKBckQW6FpOP39BEH7BYh1zVTpaSGljM9a6GtHJiw%3D&reserved=0

Dear All, in both ICZN list and Taxacom, the COI barcode practice
by Sharkey et al. to name hundreds of species has raised many discussions,
from both a nomenclatural and taxonomic point of view.

So I thought to share with the members of the list the Meier et al.'s
paper, published in Open Access in the latest issue of Cladistics.

They add more arguments (mostly taxonomic, I think) to the discussion.

Sincerely,
Evan Vlachos