[Taxacom] type species of Antitrisuloides Holloway, 1985 ?

[Markku Savela]

On 12/11/2021 22:28, Francisco Welter-Schultes via Taxacom wrote:
> Antitrisuloides Holloway, 1985, type Trisuloides catocalina Moore, 1883 
> (I could not check the original, I assume by original designation?).

I should have included some links in my original message (Moths of 
Borneo is online):

   https://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-14/pantheinae/pantheinae_2.php
   https://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-14/pantheinae/pantheinae_2_1.php

> If this is so, and your citation suggests you verified it and it is, 
> then Antitrisuloides should also belong to the subfamily Dyopsinae, not 
> to Pantheinae.


> I guess that Behounek & Kononenko 2011 just mixed this up. Maybe some in 
> a long list of names entry said "T. catocalina Moore", or they just 
> performed a search function for "catocalina Moore", and they just picked 
> the wrong name without being aware of that. Picking the wrong type 
> species leads quickly to incorrect conclusions.

That could be, but in the two papers (only abstracts available free, 
Research Gate gives the latter, though) the treat both species

    Behounek, Han & Kononenko, 2011: Zootaxa 3069 : 1-25
    https://www.biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3069.1.1

       Trisuloides catocalina -> Trisuloides

    Behounek & Kononenko, 2011:  Zootaxa 3108 : 41-52
    https://www.biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3108.1.3
 
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292659877_A_review_of_the_genera_Elydnodes_Hampson_1913_and_Antitrisuloides_Holloway_1985_with_description_of_two_new_species_Lepidoptera_Noctuidae_Revision_of_Pantheinae_contribution_III

       Tambana catocalina -> Antitrisuloides

which I followed on my site (but, my checking scripts started to 
complain about misplaced type species), and thus my question. I'm not 
expert enough to sort this out, conserning all the other species 
described and mentioned in those papers...

regards,
-- Markku Savela