[Taxacom] How important is italicisation, when writing taxon names on web pages?

[Tony Rees]

Well, you could always cite the example of Wikipedia, probably the site
with the most widely read content in the world, which does use the
italicization principle, and nobody apparently complains, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Organisms#Scientific_names.
..

If any widely adopted scientific compilation were thought to be relevant,
one could also quote Catalogue of Life, example record
https://www.catalogueoflife.org/data/taxon/6MB3T ...

Regards - Tony

Tony Rees, New South Wales, Australia
https://about.me/TonyRees
www.irmng.org


On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 02:21, John Grehan via Taxacom <
taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> wrote:

> While italics is most common, and usually within text, other options are to
> make the words stand out, such as in bold text, or underline.
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 10:06 AM Andy Mabbett via Taxacom <
> taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> wrote:
>
> > I was always taught to write species, subspecies, and genus names in
> > italics, in print and online.
> >
> > Some time ago, I persuaded the Guardian newspaper to update their
> > style guide to include this [1] - something that they mostly, but not
> > always [2], do now.
> >
> > I recently asked the UK government to update their online style guide
> > similarly, and they refused, saying:
> >
> >
> > #~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#
> >
> > "A lot of the GOV.UK style guide decisions are based on:
> >
> >      * accessibility
> >      * evidence and user research into how people read online
> >
> > "For example, some evidence suggests that people with dyslexia find
> > italics difficult to read as it can make the text appear to run
> > together and cause crowding. It's important that GOV.UK content is
> > accessible to everyone, so you shouldn't see italics used across
> > GOV.UK.
> >
> > "However, our style guide isn't set in stone - with enough relevant
> > evidence and user-research we can take suggestions for updates to our
> > style team here. If you feel that you might be able to provide some
> > evidence to support a change, let us know and we can run it past our
> > team here."
> >
> > #~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#~#
> >
> > How important an issue do you think such italicisation is?
> >
> > Is it more important on pages about taxonomy than, say, news reporting
> > aimed at the general public?
> >
> > My understanding on accessibility is that italicised paragraphs or
> > long sentences should be avoided, but single words (for emphasis) or
> > species names, are OK. Can anyone give sources to support this? LInks
> > to prior discussion would also be welcome.
> >
> >
> > [1] https://www.theguardian.com/guardian-observer-style-guide-s
> >
> > [2] e.g.
> >
> https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/oct/28/human-species-homo-bodoensis-who-lived-500000-years-ago-is-named
> >
> > --
> > Andy Mabbett
> > @pigsonthewing
> > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
> > _______________________________________________
> > Taxacom Mailing List
> >
> > Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> > You can reach the person managing the list at:
> > taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
> > http://taxacom.markmail.org
> >
> > Nurturing nuance while assailing ambiguity for about 34 years, 1987-2021.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
>
> Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit:
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> You can reach the person managing the list at:
> taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at:
> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Nurturing nuance while assailing ambiguity for about 34 years, 1987-2021.
>