[Taxacom] sufficient evidence for new species
Kenneth Kinman
kinman at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 24 20:26:52 CST 2019
2019
John,
Since the mouthparts show distinct differences, I would lean toward naming them as distinct species. They might be reduced to subspecies in the future, but at least they would have names. You might even be criticized for not naming them, so you might as well get the credit for noting the differences and formally naming the taxa (even if one or both of them turn out to be subspecies rather than full species).
---------------Ken
________________________________
From: Taxacom <taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> on behalf of John Grehan <calabar.john at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 11:25 AM
To: taxacom
Subject: [Taxacom] sufficient evidence for new species
Dear colleagues,
I would be interested in any feedback opinion on what I admit might be
taxonomic heresy but I am in a bit of a dilemma. I have a situation where I
have single specimens of moths of the same genus, each from different
islands (Indonesian Lesser Sunda). In some cases I have genitalic
differences so there is no problem recognizing different species for each
island. But in two cases the abdomen had decayed (due to tropical field
conditions presumably) that the genitalia were not preserved. However, in
the other species I have also noted differences in the mouthparts. If for
the two decayed specimens their mouthparts (labial palps) were intact and
showed distinct differences, is there any major problem my describing these
as new species based on that difference? It seems to me that it would be
just as valid as genitalia or even any other consistent different, although
not usual practice.
These moths are extremely rarely caught (at light, although likely actually
present in high numbers) and it has taken years to obtain the single
specimens. Of course I could just wait until more specimens turn up, but
then I am getting on in years and don't want to chance missing the
opportunity. There is no overriding rule about this but I would be
interested in reactions (even to anticipate what I might have to confront
in due course). Many thanks. John Grehan
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Send Taxacom mailing list submissions to: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
For list information; to subscribe or unsubscribe, visit: http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
You can reach the person managing the list at: taxacom-owner at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom email archive back to 1992 can be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
Nurturing nuance while assaulting ambiguity for 32 some years, 1987-2019.
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list