[Taxacom] Mayr vs. Woese debate over
Metabacteria/Archaebacteria (as a third Empire/Domain?)
Kenneth Kinman
kinman at hotmail.com
Tue Dec 19 20:14:52 CST 2017
2017
Dear All,
I was just reading a 2009 paper by Cavalier-Smith (Deep Phylogeny, ancestral groups and the four ages of life). In the abstract he says"
The tree of life is a useful metaphor for organismal genealogical history provided we recognize that branches sometimes fuse. Hennigian cladistics emphasizes only lineage splitting, ignoring most other major phylogenetic processes. Though methodologically useful it has been conceptually confusing and harmed taxonomy, especially in mistakenly opposing ancestral (paraphyletic) taxa."
Later in the paper, he criticizes the Three Domain classification in particular, saying: "As I have shown (Cavalier-Smith 2002a<http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/365/1537/111#ref-20>, 2006a<http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/365/1537/111#ref-24>,c<http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/365/1537/111#ref-26>), ignoring organismal structure, cell biology and palaeontology led to a now widespread fundamental misinterpretation of the history of life, the three-domain system, in which it is incorrectly assumed that eubacteria are holophyletic and not substantially older than archaebacteria and eukaryotes and that the tree is rooted between neomura and eubacteria (Woese et al. 1990<http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/365/1537/111#ref-119>). These serious errors stemmed not only from failing to integrate sequence evidence with other data, but also from unawareness of the often extremely non-clock-like nature of sequence evolution and of grossly misleading systematic errors in sequence trees for molecules that do not evolve according to naive statistical preconceptions (see Cavalier-Smith 2002a<http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/365/1537/111#ref-20>, 2006a<http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/365/1537/111#ref-24>,c<http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/365/1537/111#ref-26>). "
http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/365/1537/111#sec-8 )
________________________________
From: Taxacom <taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> on behalf of Kenneth Kinman <kinman at hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 9:32 PM
To: taxacom
Subject: [Taxacom] Mayr vs. Woese debate over Metabacteria/Archaebacteria (as a third Empire/Domain?)
Dear All,
(1) In his paper entitled "Two empires or three?", Ernst Mayr seems to have correctly assessed the inadvisability of a Three Domain/Empire classification, probably best summarized by this paragraph:
"Woese baptized the newly discovered organisms archaebacteria, thinking they would have been the first organisms on the newly habitable earth because of their ability to live in an anoxic atmosphere and in hot springs, sulfur springs (thermo-acidophiles), brines (halophiles), and other unusual habitats, presumably common on the new earth. However, when it later appeared probable that they were not the most ancient bacteria and might have a common stem with the eubacteria, Osawa and Hori (7<