[Taxacom] multiple authors new species
Stephen Thorpe
stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Sun Oct 9 22:14:37 CDT 2016
2016
Multiple authorship is getting ridiculous in some cases. Just "et al" them all out (apart from the first) for being such @#$%wits on a citation grab! At any rate, it doesn't matter one bit how you cite a reference if it has an identifier (like a doi). That's the whole point of an identifier, i.e. so citation variants can be linked to the same reference.
Stephen
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 10/10/16, bayshark at exemail.com.au <bayshark at exemail.com.au> wrote:
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] multiple authors new species
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Received: Monday, 10 October, 2016, 4:08 PM
I have a feeling that if you use paper with multiple authors
for reference,
is the best to cite all authors.
If you use just for an identification label , use "etal"
Regards
Vratislav
(name) Vratislav Ricardo Eugene Maria John Baptist
(surname) of Bejšák (read as a
Bayshark)-Colloredo-Mansfeld
website: www.coleoptera.org
address: P.O.Box 3335 , Redfern, NSW 2016
AUSTRALIA
phone : +61 0420602040
http://www.facebook.com/bayshark
alternate email: bayshark at ymail.com
(to iPhone)
-----Original Message-----
From: Taxacom [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu]
On Behalf Of Paul
Kirk
Sent: Thursday, 15 September 2016 9:35 PM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] multiple authors new species
Better a punctuation error than substituting with the
'trendy' ... & al.
Paul
________________________________
From: Taxacom <taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
on behalf of Adam Cotton
<adamcot at cscoms.com>
Sent: 15 September 2016 12:30
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] multiple authors new species
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Grehan" <calabar.john at gmail.com>
To: "Gurcharan Singh" <singhg45 at gmail.com>
Cc: "taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] multiple authors new species
> Many thanks to everyone 'et. al.' for the feedback.
>
> John Grehan
>
>
John,
It seems no-one has pointed out the punctuation error -
there is no '.'
after 'et', only after 'al'. Et is not an abbreviation,
unlike 'al', so does
not need a '.' after it.
The correct citation for the species should be Thitarodes
biruensis (Fu et
al., 2002).
By the way, I see this is a Chinese Hepialid. I remember
last time I was in
the BMNH in 2006(temporarily in Wandsworth at the time) I
was talking to my
old friend Gaden Robinson (RIP) and he was complaining about
the new
Hepialid volume of Fauna Sinica that had just arrived. It
was full of
synonyms and taxonomic issues, and he was really frustrated
having just
finished a revision of the family. He said "If I had any
hair left I would
be pulling it out right now".
Adam.
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
Taxacom Info Page - University of
Kansas<http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom>
mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Taxacom is an e-mail list for biological systematics. Named
and brought to
life by Dr. Richard Zander, Taxacom began its peripatetic
existence on a
dark and snowy ...
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at:
http://taxacom.markmail.org
Injecting Intellectual Liquidity for 29 years.
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at:
http://taxacom.markmail.org
Injecting Intellectual Liquidity for 29 years.
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
Injecting Intellectual Liquidity for 29 years.
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list