[Taxacom] Aenetus versus Achladaeus
Roderic Page
Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk
Wed Aug 31 02:48:10 CDT 2016
2016
On 31 Aug 2016, at 08:26, Markku Savela <msa at moth.iki.fi<mailto:msa at moth.iki.fi>> wrote:
On 31/08/16 10:18, Ian Kitching wrote:
And, yes, in the current offline version of LepIndex, Aenetus is the
valid name, as we updated that group from Gaden Robinson's checklist
and the Moths of Australia Checklist.
Whatever you do, please keep the "raw card index with images" available. It is about only existing source for an amateur like me to start finding the original literature references. Occasionally there are some are errors or cryptic references, but at least it gives some hints from where to look (using BHL/Internet archive).
-- Markku Savela
I second that, it’s the ability to discover the supporting literature that makes LepIndex valuable.
Regards,
Rod
---------------------------------------------------------
Roderic Page
Professor of Taxonomy
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine
College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences
Graham Kerr Building
University of Glasgow
Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
Email: Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk<mailto:Roderic.Page at glasgow.ac.uk>
Tel: +44 141 330 4778
Skype: rdmpage
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/rdmpage
LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/rdmpage
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rdmpage
Blog: http://iphylo.blogspot.com
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7101-9767
Citations: http://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?hl=en&user=4Z5WABAAAAAJ
ResearchGate https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Roderic_Page
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list