[Taxacom] Hieraciotheca Gallica et Hispanica

[Paul van Rijckevorsel]

Well, these were included in the Code, from 1906 up to and including
the 1952 editions, as an example of exsiccata that were effectively
published. Exsiccata have been disallowed only from 31 Dec 1952.

See also TL-II : http://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/33120202

According to The Plant List, the Global Compositae Checklist
accepts such names as validly published.

Paul

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Haveman, Rense" <rense.haveman at wur.nl>
To: <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2015 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Taxacom Digest, Vol 112, Issue 15


> Dear all,
>
> I've got a nomenclatural question, regarding the work of Arvet-Touvet & 
> Gautier, the Hieraciotheca Gallica et Hispanica. I guess that the names 
> given in this exciccata work are not validly published as such? I know, 
> several of the names given in this work are published in papers and books 
> following the distribution of the exciccata, but for the names for which 
> this is not the case I now consider these as not published at all.
>
> Anyone any opinion on this?
>
> R. (Rense) Haveman, Wageningen
> Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, The Netherlands
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: 
> http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Celebrating 28 years of Taxacom in 2015.
>
>
> -----
> Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
> Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
> Versie: 2015.0.6081 / Virusdatabase: 4392/10266 - datum van uitgifte: 
> 07/19/15
>