[Taxacom] New paper: Ruggiero et al. "A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms"
Stephen Thorpe
stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Sat Jul 11 18:20:41 CDT 2015
2015
So you think that a classification frozen in time for 5 years is more likely to 'accurately reflect evolutionary history'??
Stephen
--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 12/7/15, Richard Pyle <deepreef at bishopmuseum.org> wrote:
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] New paper: Ruggiero et al. "A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms"
To: "'Taxacom'" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Received: Sunday, 12 July, 2015, 10:45 AM
> Yes, you did miss something,
i.e. the point! My point was that
classification
> (particularly when based on phylogenetic analyses) is
continuously
changing
> with new information coming in all the time. Yet, I
strongly suspect that
it
> may be something like at least a decade before CoL,
etc. think about
> reviewing the results of Ruggiero et al. (2015).
Yes! Exactly!!! That is, indeed, the POINT of
the consensus
classification: Stability >> Accuracy*
*"Accuracy", as used here, effectively means "based on new
information
coming in all the time". However... many (myself
included) would argue that
there is not a particularly good correlation between a
classification "based
on new information coming in all the time", and a more
generalized
definition of the word "Accuracy", in the sense of "a
classification that
accurately reflects evolutionary history" (.... whatever
that means....)
Aloha,
Rich
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
Celebrating 28 years of Taxacom in 2015.
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list