[Taxacom] New paper: Ruggiero et al. "A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms"

[Kenneth Kinman]

Hi Stephen,                         My biggest problem with this classification (and many others) is that the subtaxa within a taxon are alphabetically arranged, which automatically and immediately affects their naturalness from the start.  Paleognathae is thus placed after Neognathae, and worse yet Aves is placed before all the other reptiles.  The Superclass Angiospermae is a mess, which for some reason they only classify as a single Class.  Therefore, the subtaxa are an unnatural mess.  Although I nitpick about the details of the cladistic classifications of angiosperms, at least they are fairly natural (even with their unnatural rejection of a few very natural and useful taxa).                              Neomycota is listed as Dikarya, so it comes before Eomycota.  And they don't even mention the name Eumycota (which has always been more informative than "Fungi").  The mammal orders Cingulata and Pilosa aren't listed together at all, and how many non-mammalogists even know what animals those taxa include?  And totally separating Archaebacteria from their relatives Posibacteria is a horrible oversight that has plagued classifications for well over 20 years.                            ---------------Ken----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:11:57 -0700
> From: stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
> To: Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu; tonyrees49 at gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] New paper: Ruggiero et al. "A Higher Level	Classification of All Living Organisms"
> 
> The problem with it being "followed in future by both ITIS and Catalogue of Life" is that new developments, based on scientific evidence, will not be considered (at least not until some big revised version of the present paper is published). So, bioinformatics and science part ways for a while. It is really just a case of "choose your own classification", and if you wish to choose to follow Ruggiero et al.'s paper, you can, but there may be better alternatives.
> 
> Stephen
> 
> --------------------------------------------
> On Thu, 9/7/15, Tony Rees <tonyrees49 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>  Subject: [Taxacom] New paper: Ruggiero et al. "A Higher Level Classification of All Living Organisms"
>  To: "taxacom" <Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
>  Received: Thursday, 9 July, 2015, 12:52 PM
>  
>  Dear Taxacomers,
>  
>  Since I did not see this mentioned on Taxacom earlier
>  (perhaps I missed
>  it), list members may be interested to know that Michael
>  Ruggiero et al.'s
>  paper "A Higher Level Classification of All Living
>  Organisms" has been out
>  in PLOS One since 20 April 2015, the link is here:
>  
>  http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0119248
>  
>  This is an internally consistent treatment of "all" extant
>  taxa down to the
>  level of Order (in most cases), to be followed in future by
>  both ITIS and
>  Catalogue of Life I understand. For those interested in
>  going further to
>  the level of family, I have come across a spreadsheet with
>  the latter
>  information prepared by the same authors (possibly slightly
>  earlier
>  version) labelled "GGI family data" at http://ggi.eol.org/downloads .
>  
>  Of course the above treatments do not include fossil
>  orders/families but
>  maybe these will be in scope at some point in the future
>  (??)
>  
>  Hoping this is of interest to at least some Taxacom
>  readers,
>  
>  Best regards - Tony Rees, New South Wales, Australia
>  _______________________________________________
>  Taxacom Mailing List
>  Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>  http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>  The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
>  
>  Celebrating 28 years of Taxacom in 2015.
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
> 
> Celebrating 28 years of Taxacom in 2015.