[Taxacom] Proofs for opinion

[Stephen Thorpe]

"Evil", who mentioned "evil"?? Not me. Straw man argument if there ever was one! I was only suggesting a certain level of self interest above the interests of others. Sound far fetched??

Stephen
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 10/1/15, Frank.Krell at dmns.org <Frank.Krell at dmns.org> wrote:

 Subject: RE: [Taxacom] Proofs for opinion
 To: stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz, taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu, tpape at snm.ku.dk
 Received: Saturday, 10 January, 2015, 7:07 PM
 
 Never heard of people
 wearing different hats?
 
 An
 more news for you: Neither the whole world nor commissioners
 are intrinsically evil.
 
 Frank
 
 -----Original Message-----
 From: Stephen Thorpe [mailto:stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz]
 
 Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 11:04 PM
 To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu;
 tpape at snm.ku.dk;
 Frank T. Krell
 Subject: RE: [Taxacom] Proofs
 for opinion
 
 >We
 consulted with him<
 No, no you
 didn't! HE was one of the WE ...
 
 Stephen
 --------------------------------------------
 On Sat, 10/1/15, Frank.Krell at dmns.org
 <Frank.Krell at dmns.org>
 wrote:
 
  Subject: RE:
 [Taxacom] Proofs for opinion
  To: stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz,
 taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu,
 tpape at snm.ku.dk
  Received: Saturday, 10 January, 2015, 6:10
 PM
  
  Then there is time for
 a
  surprise for you.
  We
 consulted with him, of
  course, as we did
 with other major publishers.
  
  Frank
 
 ________________________________________
 
 From:
  Stephen Thorpe [stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz]
  Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 2:34 PM
  To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu;
  tpape at snm.ku.dk;
  Frank T. Krell
  Subject: RE:
 [Taxacom] Proofs
  for opinion
  
  Well, I mean
  more so and especially with regard to
 electronic publishing  (which didn't exist in the Code
 a decade ago).
  
  I
 don't think it is a
  "conspiracy
 theory" to think that the electronic  amendement was
 "heavily influenced" by the one  commissioner who
 is also a major commercial publisher.
 
 I'd be surprised if it wasn't.
  
  Cheers,
  
 
 Stephen
  
 
 --------------------------------------------
  On Fri, 9/1/15, Frank.Krell at dmns.org
  <Frank.Krell at dmns.org>
  wrote:
  
  
 Subject: RE:
  [Taxacom] Proofs for
 opinion
   To: stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz,
  taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu,
  tpape at snm.ku.dk
   Received: Friday, 9 January, 2015, 9:44
 AM
  
  
  
  
   "Rather, I
 strongly
   suspect that we will have to
 learn to live  with zoological
  
 nomenclature that is
  somewhat less than
 well-defined, i.e.
  
 
 somewhat vague and fuzzy around the edges."
  
   Wow, Stephen, you
  haven't
   learned that
 yet - in all these
  decades?
  
   And stop with
  your Magnolia Press conspiracy
   theory. This
  is just not
 true.
  
   Frank
  
   Dr.
  
 Frank-T.
  Krell
   Curator
 of Entomology
   Commissioner, International
 Commission on
   Zoological Nomenclature
  
  Chair, ICZN ZooBank
   Committee
   Department of
 Zoology
   Denver
  Museum of
 Nature & Science
   2001
  Colorado Boulevard
   Denver,
 CO 80205-5798
  USA
   Frank.Krell at dmns.org
  
   Phone: (+1) (303)
 370-8244
   Fax: (+1) (303) 331-6492
   http://www.dmns.org/science/museum-scientists/frank-krell
   lab page: http://www.dmns.org/krell-lab