[Taxacom] Proofs for opinion
Stephen Thorpe
stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Wed Jan 7 17:57:24 CST 2015
2015
Yes, that and ONLY THAT will definitively solve the problem, i.e. the ICZN needs to act and clarify the Code
Stephen
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 8/1/15, Walker, Ken <kwalker at museum.vic.gov.au> wrote:
Subject: RE: [Taxacom] Proofs for opinion
To: "Stephen Thorpe" <stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz>, "Taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Cc: "Pete Cranston" <pscranston at gmail.com>
Received: Thursday, 8 January, 2015, 12:46 PM
Thanks Stephen,
Our hope is that the ICZN
takes these comments and opinions on board and better
defines the code. We all want EV to be a valid publication
- make it so.
Cheers,
Ken
________________________________________
From:
Stephen Thorpe [stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz]
Sent: Thursday, 8 January 2015 10:43 AM
To: Taxacom; Walker, Ken
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Proofs for opinion
Hi Ken (and list):
Unfortunately, no matter how many people agree
that something which they desire is so, it doesn't make
it so. The issues here are vastly more complicated. The
electronic amendment, I suggest, was tailored to the
Magnolia Press publishing model, with minimal regard for any
other. Hence, it is difficult to fit the Code around other
publishing models. The main problem is that the Code fails
to define what exactly is meant by a "preliminary
version". The botanical code does spell this out
(better), but that is of no direct relevance to zoology. So
how can we argue the point here, when there is no definition
of "preliminary version"? We surely can't just
make up whatever definition suits our purposes? My own view
is that, on pragmatic grounds, we must consider these
"Early View" publications to be validly published
(all other things being equal). The big problem which
remains, though - and it is something that few people seem
to understand - is that although
validly
published, how can we verify that they were indeed validly
published. Answer: ONLY IF the EARLY VIEW version (PDF) has
been archived and is accessible. As far as I can tell, if
anything at all gets archived, it is the final paginated
version. This could be a problem ...
Stephen
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 8/1/15, Walker, Ken <kwalker at museum.vic.gov.au>
wrote:
Subject: [Taxacom]
Proofs for opinion
To: "Taxacom"
<taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Received: Thursday, 8 January, 2015, 12:21
PM
An
opinion piece newly published in Systematic Entomology
addresses recent discussion of the taxonomic
validity of
names appearing in Early View
(that is, new names published
electronically, prior to appearance in a journal issue).
Two
previous editors of the journal,
Wiley's Publishing Manager
and the
taxonomic editor of Austral Entomology combine
to argue that Early View constitutes valid
publication.
Eighteen senior systematists,
the current editors, the
former Executive
Secretary, International Commission on
Zoological Nomenclature and the former Publishing Manager
of
Wiley journals endorse the opinion.
The article is free access at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/syen.12119/pdf
This e-mail is solely for the
named addressee and may be
confidential.
You should only read, disclose, transmit,
copy, distribute, act in reliance on or commercialise the
contents if you are authorised to do so. If
you are not the
intended recipient of this
e-mail, please notify postmaster at museum.vic.gov.au<mailto:postmaster at museum.vic.gov.au>
by email immediately, or notify the sender and
then destroy
any copy of this message.
Views expressed in this email are
those of
the individual sender, except where specifically
stated to be those of an officer of Museum
Victoria. Museum
Victoria does not
represent, warrant or guarantee that the
integrity of this communication has been maintained nor
that
it is free from errors, virus or
interference.
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be
searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
Celebrating 28 years of
Taxacom in 2015.
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list