[Taxacom] Paraphyletic groups as natural units of biological
classification
Stephen Thorpe
stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Sat Oct 4 17:04:48 CDT 2014
2014
Well, I guess in practice (unless we are palaeontologists) we would call two sister species a monophyletic group, or else no grouping of extant taxa could be monophyletic (except perhaps for a "paraphyletic species" and its daughter species!)
Stephen
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 4/10/14, Laurent Raty <l.raty at skynet.be> wrote:
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Paraphyletic groups as natural units of biological classification
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Received: Saturday, 4 October, 2014, 8:41 PM
On 10/03/2014 11:49 PM,
Stephen Thorpe wrote:
> Not necessarily!
There might be a monophyletic group consisting of two sister
species (or two sister taxa, one of which is a single
species). Choose any one, and the residue is
monophyletic!
A "group
consisting of two sister species" cannot be
monophyletic.
(This definition excludes the
common ancestor.)
Laurent
-
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be
searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org
Celebrating 27 years of
Taxacom in 2014.
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list