[Taxacom] Paraphyletic tagging
Kenneth Kinman
kinman at hotmail.com
Fri Oct 3 16:41:35 CDT 2014
2014
Hi Curtis, Well, we've not created a taxon based "only" on what it lacks. It must also possess the amniote synapomorphy. Otherwise it would also include non-amniotes. It's sort of like a medical diagnosis done on a dual basis---not only on possession of certain symptoms, but also on the lack of other symptoms. As for the mammalian synapomorphy, I don't think it happened in a single speciation event, but it probably wasn't "gradual" either. In terms of the punctuated-equilibrium theory, I would say that it happened during a punctuation rather than a period of gradual equilibrium. It could take a hundred generations and still be relatively sudden on a geological time scale. In any case, ear bones make a better synapomorphy than mammary glands or hair. -----------------Ken
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 12:39:01 -0700
> From: lists at curtisclark.org
> To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Paraphyletic tagging
>
> To be clear, although Stephen's answer works for the extant species, Ken
> guessed that I meant more globally.
>
> On 2014-10-03 7:22 AM, Kenneth Kinman wrote:
> >
> > I would rather phrase it: "Amniotes lacking the synapomorphies
> > of Mammalia and Aves".
>
> So we've created a taxon based on a lack?
>
> > Hair and feathers would not be the best synapomorphies to pick as they
> > evolved too gradually (even baby Tyrannosaurus rex may have had
> > feathers).
>
> And there are even hairy things in some Ornithischia that have been
> interpreted as being homologous with feathers. I'm not saying that
> thecodonts had feathers, but if a thecodont fossil with clear feathers
> was discovered, I wouldn't be astounded.
>
> > For Mammalia, the best synapomorphy so far discovered seems to be when
> > the three ear bones decoupled from the mandible.
>
> But unless that happened in a single speciation event, there is still
> the issue of where in a gradual shift do we draw the line.
>
> --
> Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark
> Biological Sciences +1 909 869 4140
> Cal Poly Pomona, Pomona CA 91768
>
> _______________________________________________
>
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list