[Taxacom] [iczn-list] provisions to the Code

[Stephen Thorpe]

Now who is being semantic! It is tantamount to censorship. Hoser is considered offensive, and so he is being removed!
?
Scientific merit is both a continuum and a multifaceted thing.?I know some "official taxonomists" who lack merit in one way or another.
?
At any rate, the answer to the Hoser problem is simple, but will the ICZN have the good sense to do it? They don't need to sit in judgement of his taxonomy. All they need do is deem his journal AJH to be an invalid publication. This has the advantage of allowing Hoser to submit to regular peer-reviewed journals if he so wishes, like the rest of us, and be judged like the rest of us by his peers.
?
Stephen


________________________________
From: Wolfgang Wuster <w.wuster at bangor.ac.uk>
To: "taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> 
Sent: Wednesday, 16 April 2014 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] [iczn-list] provisions to the Code



________________________________________
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu <taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu> on behalf of Neal Evenhuis <neale at bishopmuseum.org>
Sent: 15 April 2014 23:12
To: Stephen Thorpe; Doug Yanega; taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] [iczn-list] provisions to the Code


> But to get back to the crux of the matter. Some on the list want to nix
> what Hoser has done because they claim the specimen (with a specimen
> number) that he specifically designated "did not exist". That is hogwash.
> And is bordering on censorship, in my opinion.

I think we need to stop this talk of censorship.

According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, "to censor" is defined as "to examine books, movies, letters, etc., in order to remove things that are considered to be offensive, immoral, harmful to society, etc."

Nobody is proposing to do such a thing.

However, there is a difference between the right to free expression and the right to be taken seriously. The former is (in my book) absolute, the latter does not exist. The problem is that the letter of the Code seeks to bestow that non-existing latter right on the authors of names irrespective of merit. That's what many who consider themselves scientists first and nomenclaturists second have a problem with. However, that does not constitute censorship.

Cheers,

Wolfgang


Rhif Elusen Gofrestredig 1141565 - Registered Charity No. 1141565

Gall y neges e-bost hon, ac unrhyw atodiadau a anfonwyd gyda hi, gynnwys deunydd cyfrinachol ac wedi eu bwriadu i'w defnyddio'n unig gan y sawl y cawsant eu cyfeirio ato (atynt). Os ydych wedi derbyn y neges e-bost hon trwy gamgymeriad, rhowch wybod i'r anfonwr ar unwaith a dilewch y neges. Os na fwriadwyd anfon y neges atoch chi, rhaid i chi beidio a defnyddio, cadw neu ddatgelu unrhyw wybodaeth a gynhwysir ynddi. Mae unrhyw farn neu safbwynt yn eiddo i'r sawl a'i hanfonodd yn unig ac nid yw o anghenraid yn cynrychioli barn Prifysgol Bangor. Nid yw Prifysgol Bangor yn gwarantu bod y neges e-bost hon neu unrhyw atodiadau yn rhydd rhag firysau neu 100% yn ddiogel. Oni bai fod hyn wedi ei ddatgan yn uniongyrchol yn nhestun yr e-bost, nid bwriad y neges e-bost hon yw ffurfio contract rhwymol - mae rhestr o lofnodwyr awdurdodedig ar gael o Swyddfa Cyllid Prifysgol Bangor.

This email and any attachments may contain confidential material and is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you must not use, retain or disclose any information contained in this email. Any views or opinions are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Bangor University. Bangor University does not guarantee that this email or any attachments are free from viruses or 100% secure. Unless expressly stated in the body of the text of the email, this email is not intended to form a binding contract - a list of authorised signatories is available from the Bangor University Finance Office. 



_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched at: http://taxacom.markmail.org/

Celebrating 27 years of Taxacom in 2014.