[Taxacom] Dealing with the morally reprehensible act of
plagiarisation
Ken Kinman
kinman at hotmail.com
Tue May 28 09:59:34 CDT 2013
2013
Hi Raymond,
I'm wondering why you are accusing Schleip (2008) of plagiarism. He even mentions your 2000 paper in the title: "Revision of the Genus Leiopython Hubrecht 1879 (Serpentes: Pythonidae) with the Redescription of Taxa Recently Described by Hoser (2000) and the Description of New Species."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: viper007 at live.com.au
> To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 00:28:14 +1030
> Subject: [Taxacom] Dealing with the morally reprehensible act of plagiarisation
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am sure I am not the only one here to have had their
> work plagiarized by one or more others.(This being the act of using a person's work and not citing or correctly attributing the data).
>
> Examples in terms of my own work and papers include serial offences by the Wuster et al. (Kaiser et
> al.) gang of thieves, a few of many examples of which I list below:
>
> ?
> Hoser
> 1998a/repeated in Hoser 2002b Acanthophis taxonomy
> (confirmed by Aplin and Donnellan 1999, Wells 2002d), (also see support from
> Starkey 2008 dating back many years), then plagiarized by Fry et al. 2002 (including W?ster) and
> W?ster et al. (2005):
>
> ?
> Hoser
> 2000b/2003e/2004a Python Taxonomy (confirmed by Rawlings and Donnellan 2003 (?Chondropython? - Hoser 2000), confirmed by Wells 2005
> (?Morelia? Carpet Pythons), Rawlings,
> et al. 2008 (?Broghammerus? and other genera - Hoser 2003/4)); then plagiarized by O?Shea 2007 (?Leiopython?); also then plagiarized by Schleip
> 2008 (?Leiopython hoserae? and other from Hoser 2000):
>
> ?
> Hoser
> 1998b/2000b/2001 ?Pseudechis? group
> taxonomy (confirmed by Kuch et al. 2005),
> then plagiarized by W?ster et. al. (2005):
>
> ?
> Hoser 2002a Oxyuranus
> taxonomy, plagiarized
> by W?ster et. al. (2005):
>
> ?
> Hoser
> 2003a Pseudonaja taxonomy, plagiarized
> by David Williams et al. (including W?ster and O?Shea) (2008).
>
>
>
> Of course others have plagiarized my work, particularly
> many of my papers on breeding snakes from the 1980?s and 1990?s, but I?ll save
> listing them as this would include dozens of entries and this is after all a
> taxonomy/nomenclature forum.
>
> While plagiarization is a reprehensible and morally
> repugnant act, what sort of actions do you suggest are best to combat this
> scourge, both before and after the fact?
>
> Thanks in advance for any ideas.
>
>
>
> Snakebusters? - Australia's best reptiles?
>
> The only hands-on reptiles? shows that lets people hold the animals?.
>
> Reptile parties?, events, courses
> Phones: 9812 3322
>
> 0412 777 211
>
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The Taxacom Archive back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
>
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> (2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
>
> Celebrating 26 years of Taxacom in 2013.
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list