[Taxacom] FW: cladistic analysis for morphological
characters -- UPGMA is not cladistics
Richard Pyle
deepreef at bishopmuseum.org
Tue Nov 13 11:33:21 CST 2012
2012
> Hey, I think after years and years we are slowly, slowly converging on
> agreeing what the question is for all those answers in the literature.
Weird how all those answers end up being "42".
Aloha,
Rich
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list