[Taxacom] APG III genus list
Tony.Rees at csiro.au
Tony.Rees at csiro.au
Wed Oct 12 01:46:18 CDT 2011
2011
And the final few (sorry, missed from the email below..)
Cervantesiaceae, Microteaceae (both new, 2010)
Thesiaceae - revived following Nickrent et al., 2010.
That's all I hope!!
Cheers - Tony
> -----Original Message-----
> From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-
> bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Tony.Rees at csiro.au
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 October 2011 5:38 PM
> To: twendt at mail.utexas.edu; taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Subject: [ExternalEmail] Re: [Taxacom] APG III genus list
>
> Also for completeness, a few families in GRIN recognised subsequent to
> APG III, mainly in Santalales following Nickrent et al., 2010, except
> for Stixaceae which is used for some genera unplaced in APG III:
>
> Amphorogynaceae
> Comandraceae
> Coulaceae
> Nanodeaceae
> Stixaceae
> Strombosiaceae
> Ximeniaceae
>
> Cheers - Tony
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-
> > bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Tony.Rees at csiro.au
> > Sent: Wednesday, 12 October 2011 5:12 PM
> > To: twendt at mail.utexas.edu; taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > Subject: [ExternalEmail] Re: [Taxacom] APG III genus list
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Just following up a thread here from last month, I finally got around
> > to checking out the GRIN taxonomy as suggested by Tom below, and can
> > confirm that (for angiosperms) it does follow APG III with a few
> > exceptions, listed below in case these are of interest. In the main
> the
> > latter seem to be small families maintained by some authorities,
> > subsumed into larger ones in APG III, though in at least some cases
> > there is a note in APG that they may need to be split off with
> further
> > study (and so round we go...)
> >
> > Differences between GRIN taxonomy (Sep 2011 download) and APG III:
> >
> > (GRIN => APG III)
> >
> > Chenopodiaceae => Amaranthaceae
> > Valerianaceae => Caprifoliaceae
> > Linnaeaceae => Caprifoliaceae
> > Dipsacaceae => Caprifoliaceae
> > Diervillaceae => Caprifoliaceae
> > Morinaceae => Caprifoliaceae
> > Viscaceae => Santalaceae
> > Erythropalaceae => Olacaceae
> > Aptandraceae => Olacaceae
> > Octoknemaceae => Olacaceae
> > Ledocarpaceae => Vivianiaceae
> > Taccaceae => Dioscoreaceae
> > Francoaceae => Melianthaceae
> > Didymelaceae => Buxaceae
> > Maundiaceae => Juncaginaceae
> > Rhoipteleaceae => Juglandaceae
> >
> > Of course different sources will agree to disagree with regard to
> these
> > and similar lumping/splitting issues, it is just that if you are
> using
> > GRIN as an exemplar of APG III genus placements it is as well to be
> > aware where the two systems presently differ. There are also a couple
> > of spelling variants (Ripogonaceae => Rhipogonaceae, Toricelliaceae
> =>
> > Torricelliaceae) to be aware of as well, again found differently
> > spelled depending on the source you prefer.
> >
> > In any case GRIN are to be commended for making all their data
> > available so freely for download, to enable such comparisons to be
> > undertaken without drama (thanks, GRINners!)
> >
> > Regards - Tony
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-
> > > bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Wendt
> > > Sent: Saturday, 3 September 2011 5:27 AM
> > > To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > > Subject: Re: [Taxacom] APG III genus list
> > >
> > > Check out the GRIN Taxonomy web site at
> > > http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/index.pl?language=en
> > > Very useful; downloadable; follows APG3.
> > >
> > > Tom Wendt
> > >
> > > >Dear colleagues,
> > > >
> > > >In about twelve months, herbarium LD (Lund, Sweden) will move all
> > its
> > > >c. 3 million specimens to new facilities. We have now decided to
> > also
> > > >use this opportunity to completely resort our collections (which
> are
> > > >today ordered after various more or less outdated
> classifications).
> > As
> > > >far as possible, the new organisation of the vascular plants will
> be
> > > >families in alphabetical order and genera in alphabetical order
> > within
> > > >the families. As far as families are concerned, the APG III system
> > is
> > > >the natural choice. However, to be able to implement APG III
> > > >consistently, we would need a list of all "accepted" genera, if
> > > >possible with some frequently used synonyms as well, included in
> > each
> > > >of the families recognised by APG III. At present, we have
> compiled
> > > >such lists for some families from various sources, but we do not
> > have
> > > >that kind of complete list that we would need to resort all of our
> > > >vast international collections. Could somebody advice me from
> where
> > I
> > > >may obtain such a complete list of genera (preferably in the form
> of
> > > >an excel spreadsheet with names of genera in one column and the
> > family
> > > >to which they belong in another)? Of course, we would prefer an
> > > >"authorative" list agreed upon by multiple systematist and/or
> > allready
> > > >implemented in some major herbarium...
> > > >
> > > >Yours,
> > > >Torbj?rn
> > > >
> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > --
> > > >>
> > > >> Torbj?rn Tyler, Ph.D,
> > > >>
> > > >> - Curator at herbarium LD.
> > > >> - Editor in Chief of Nordic Journal of Botany.
> > > >> - Deputy secretary of Lund Botanical Society, with special
> > > >> responsibility for Projekt Sk?nes Mossor.
> > > >> - Responsible for the project The Hieracia of Sweden.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Botanical Museum
> > > >> ?. Vallgatan 18
> > > >> SE-223 61 Lund
> > > >>
> > > >> tel. +(0)46-222 89 65
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> e-mail:
> > > >> torbjorn.tyler at botmus.lu.se<mailto:torbjorn.tyler at botmus.lu.se>
> > > >>
> > > >> Private address: Enningerv?gen 12, SE-243 31 H??r (=Hoeoer),
> tel.
> > > >> +(0)413-23123.
> > > >>
> > ___________________________________________________________________
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >
> > > >Taxacom Mailing List
> > > >Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > > >http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> > > >
> > > >The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be
> > > >searched with either of these methods:
> > > >
> > > >(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
> > > >
> > > >(2) a Google search specified as:
> > > >site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your
> > > >search terms here
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > >
> > > Taxacom Mailing List
> > > Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> > >
> > > The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either
> of
> > > these methods:
> > >
> > > (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
> > >
> > > (2) a Google search specified as:
> > > site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Taxacom Mailing List
> > Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> >
> > The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
> > these methods:
> >
> > (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
> >
> > (2) a Google search specified as:
> > site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
> these methods:
>
> (1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> (2) a Google search specified as:
> site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list