[Taxacom] Reproducibility of phylogenetic analysis

[Peter Hovenkamp]

That just means that those papers do not illustrate the point I was 
trying to make.

Peter Hovenkamp

Bob Mesibov wrote:
> Peter Hovenkamp wrote:
>
> 'Illustrative examples are easy to find, but "subjective judgments about similarities and relationships" are not part of them.'
>
> I disagree, Peter. The branch of taxonomy I'm familiar with is rich in papers that say (in one way or another) that the author's subjective judgements about similarities and relationships agree with those of a previous author or authors.
>