[Taxacom] DNA only descriptions

[John Grehan]

That perception is probably accurate. After all, if molecules are the Holy Grail why bother with inferior morphology that will take so much more time and effort anyway?

John Grehan

-----Original Message-----
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Sergio Vargas
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 4:19 PM
To: jwhitfie at life.illinois.edu
Cc: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] DNA only descriptions

sure!

I think we all are in the same team, and that after years of molecular
vs morphology we are somewhat close to understand we need ALL possible
sources of information to describe organisms. I meant, "traditional"
taxonomists seem to be happy to have molecules but molecular guys
doesn't even try to include morphology in their analyses... just a
perception I guess...

sergio

-- 
Sergio Vargas R., M.Sc.
Molecular Geo- and Palaeobiology Lab.
Dept. of Geo- & Environmental Sciences, Palaeontology and Geobiology
LMU München
Richard-Wagner Str. 10
80333 Munich, Germany
tel. +49 89 2180 17929
s.vargas at lrz.uni-muenchen.de
sergio.vargasr at ecci.ucr.ac.cr

_______________________________________________

Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom

The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:

(1) http://taxacom.markmail.org

Or (2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here