[Taxacom] FW: DNA only descriptions

[Tom Schweich]

A. Nonymous wrote:
>  I´ll begin by saying that I fully agree that a morphological description in Zoology/Botany is necessary, but **only** because of the issue of accessibility and retrievability. -- Emphasis added.  

Can you imagine an edition of Peterson's Western Birds containing only 
DNA descriptions ?   How about usage in the field as a reason to have a 
morphological description? 

-- 
Tom Schweich KJ6BIT tas27 at schweich.com
http://www.schweich.com
http://twitter.com/schweich