hyphenated names

[Jacques Melot]

  Le 28-10-03, ? 1:39 -0800, nous recevions de Adolf Ceska :

>International Code of Botanical Nomenclature - Preambles
>
>7. The rules and recommendations apply to all organisms traditionally
>treated as plants, whether fossil or non-fossil, e.g., blue-green algae
>(Cyanobacteria; fungi, including chytrids, oomycetes, and SLIME MOULDS;
>photosynthetic protists and taxonomically related non-photosynthetic groups.
>Provisions for the names of hybrids appear in App. I.



    Puisque vous semblez vouloir contredire Paul Kirk, le mieux aurait
?t? de souligner aussi ? traditionally ? (d'o? ? The rules and
recommendations apply to all organisms TRADITIONALLY
treated as plants ?), puisqu'il ?crit :

>  Yes, TRADITIONALLY they are 'plants' but in reality they are 'animals'.
>  The last edition of the Dictionary of the Fungi FOLLOWED TRADITION
>  but for higher taxa provided both forms of the higher taxon name
>  termination.

    Voil?...

    Jacques Melot




>Adolf Ceska, Victoria, BC, Canada
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>BEN archive: http://www.ou.edu/cas/botany-micro/ben/
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you think it will take,
>even if you take into account Hofstadter's Law."
>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: Taxacom Discussion List [mailto:TAXACOM at LISTSERV.NHM.KU.EDU] On
>>  Behalf Of Paul Kirk
>>  Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:29 AM
>>  To: TAXACOM at LISTSERV.NHM.KU.EDU
>>  Subject: Re: hyphenated names
>>
>  > Yes, traditionally they are 'plants' but in reality they are 'animals'.
>>  The
>>  last edition of the Dictionary of the Fungi followed tradition but for
>  > higher taxa provided both forms of the higher taxon name termination.
>  > Needs
>>  an ICZN 'expert' to comment to determine is their equivalent of Art. 60.9
>>  has the same advice.
>>
>>  Paul Kirk
>>  CABI Bioscience
>>