validity of taxonomic publication
Thomas G. Lammers
lammers at FMPPR.FMNH.ORG
Wed Feb 19 13:04:06 CST 1997
1997
At 12:33 PM 02-19-97 -0600, Paul J. Johnson wrote:
>Life in this little is a bit more complicated. In the United States is
>a document service, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan, that
>has conned our universities and colleges into having all doctoral and
>many M.S. theses "published." The student is required to pay all
>charges and in exchange has the dubious privilage of having their
>document copyrighted for them, though it is actually in the name of UM.
>In fact, UM sells copies of each thesis, and in a practical sense royalities
>do not go to most authors because of the low
>volume of sales of most theses. Indeed, according to the Zoological Code
>nomenclatural acts done within a thesis are not valid and the UM
>"publication" system does not qualify. However, this restriction only
>applies to only to nomenclatural acts, such as new names, synonymies, etc. All
>other data is available and the question of published or not must be
>reconsidered. For example, distributional records, ecological
>measures, and other non-nomenclatural information can be considered
>published.
> In my familiarity, there has not been adequate discussion and
>community-wide decision in the zoological sciences as to whether
>non-nomenclatural information in a thesis is acceptably published, or
>under what constraints. However, UM considers their process as
>publication, and many professional categories do consider UM
>publication as valid. I'm not positive on my recollection, but did not
>the latest botanical code completely discount thesis information as
>published, or was this only nomenclatural data?
Botanists have taken this into account. Art. 29.1 of the International Code
of Botanical Nomenclature states: "Publication ... is not effected ... by
the issue of microfilm made from manuscripts, type-scripts or other
unpublished material."
**************************************************************************
Thomas G. Lammers
Department of Botany Classification, Nomenclature,
Field Museum of Natural History Phylogeny and Biogeography
Roosevelt Road at Lake Shore Drive of the Campanulaceae
Chicago, Illinois 60605-2496 USA
e-mail: lammers at fmppr.fmnh.org
voice mail: 312-922-9410 ext. 317
fax: 312-427-2530
"... what could possibly be easier or more beautiful than 'Campanula'? What
affectation more gratuitous and silly than 'bell-flower'?" -- R. Farrer
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list